Imperial Earth
by Arthur C. Clarke
I just re-read this after an interval of
roughly 35 years. Written to commemorate the US bicentennial in 1976, it’s
basically propaganda for space travel and technological innovation, aimed at
young Americans. It’s set in a future where space travel within the Solar
System is common, colonies have been established on (at least) Mercury, the
Moon, Mars and Titan, and the American political model, tempered by a degree of
enlightened authoritarianism, has been extended throughout the interplanetary human community.
The central character is a man from Titan,
locally rich and very powerful, who is travelling to Earth to clone himself an
heir. He does not, however, behave as you might expect such a person to behave.
Instead, he comes across as a cerebral, tentative, effete introvert – a bit
like the author himself, then. The other characters are even less convincing –
they’re just outlines, not even cardboard cutouts.
But the point of the book is not the
characters. It’s the gee-whiz technology and the surprising science facts. As a
young reader, I found these sufficiently diverting. Sadly, I no longer do. Part
of the trouble is that here we have Clarke in ‘prophet of the Space Age’ mode,
but his prophecies are trivial and cockeyed.
He himself once divided insufficiently
radical predictions about the future into two kinds: failures of nerve and
failures of imagination. In this book, he displays few failures of nerve, but
several, unusually for him, of imagination. He foresees (at least implicitly)
the personal computer, the mobile personal assistant, the mobile communicator
and the internet, but he doesn’t put them together and completely fails (as, to
be fair, everybody did) to realize the massive consequences that would result
from their amalgamation.
Consequently, his vision of how information
is distributed in his imagined future is very centralized, bureaucratic and in
some ways almost authoritarian. And when he gets down to the details of user
interfaces, menus and things like that, he visualizes a very clunky,
library-catalogue-type presentation, not terribly user-friendly at all.
What seems to be missing is any
appreciation of the effect of competitive consumer capitalism on the design and
presentation of technologies. Its absence here may tell us something useful
about the distinction between ‘constructive’ technologies (whose consequences
may be foreseen) and ‘disruptive’ technologies (which change our lives in
unpredictable ways). Having failed to imagine the disruption, Clarke ends up
profiling a future that looks more old-fashioned than the reality of our
present day. Actually, it looks a bit old-fashioned even from a 1976
perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment