‘ ‘The country’s worst violence in decades’, apparently. |
It’s a clueless shambles, just like the events it attempts to describe. The author’s principal sources appear to be discarded Rajapaksa creatures like Dilith Jayaweera and Udaya Gammanpila. I suppose it’s at least creditable that she gets them to talk. Of course, they tell their own versions of the story, in which everything is Basil’s or Mahinda’s fault and they come up smelling of roses. Inevitably, so does Gotabaya Rajapaksa. An ‘austere, devout and straight-talking military man’ if you please, rather than an incompetent, corrupt, death-dealing figure who needed to plunge the nation into debt in order to enable a lakhs-strong military, supersonic bombers and kilotons of ordnance to defeat a guerrilla army of five thousand – murdering thousands of civilians in the process – and sell it as a great victory.
It was quite amazing to read a Guardian article on Sri Lanka that didn’t mention Mullivaikal even once. That might even have been a relief, frankly, but no, wait a minute: it’s much worse than that! Ms Ellis-Petersen writes, concerning the events of 9 and 10 May, that ‘the country’s worst violence in more than three decades took place.’ Holy smoke! She actually forgot Mullivaikal! She forgot the bloody war! Or else she thinks tear gas at Galle Face and a few kleptocrats’ and drug dealers’ empty houses getting torched are worse than 26 years of armed conflict and the deaths of thousands of unarmed civilians on an open beach...
Compared to that solecism, Ms Petersen’s other howlers are trivial. Nivard Cabral, slimeball of the ages, is practically made to sound like a hero. There is not a word about Ranil Wickremasinghe and his efforts to sabotage peaceful regime change and save the Rajapaksas from gaol. All she gets out of him is a single meaningless quote. I suppose that’s all the sorry bugger is good for these days: Ranil ‘Busted Flush’ Wickremasinghe.
I could go on, but I think you get the picture, so I will end with just one more observation: this story is two months late. It describes the situation in Sri Lanka as it was on, say, May 12. Crap as it is, it might at least have had current-affairs value if it had come out then. Appearing on July 7, it’s a load of worthless arsewipe. The Guardian should be ashamed of itself, and as for the lady who wrote it, she’s in the wrong profession. She should get a job in the public-relations industry with a portfolio of banana-republic governments for clients.
When you say banana republic you mean a country like Sri Lanka. It is a shame blogs cannot meet the standards of published writing - anything goes it would appear with yours
ReplyDeleteIf you think the writing's rubbish, go ahead and do better.
DeleteAgree on all of its content
ReplyDelete