14 April 2022

‘Big Match Vibe’

 


Image credit: Radhitha Ravihansa Sooriyagoda

Expat pundits, grievance peddlers, farts of the old elite!
This is not your moment; your moment never is.
Take your stinking possets and placebos
Brewed in well-lit comfort far from tear-gas
And neck them down yourselves. I hope you choke.
On the barricades there is no wealth of choices,
Only opportunities to seize as they arise
And only just the single issue, darling: Arseholes Out.

You hate it, don’t you, that your well-worn saddle
No longer fits the hobbyhorse you rode?
Your misanthropy wrapped in worthy causes,
Your social-media fame for being woke,
Now trumped by something not at all suburban –
Something real that’s happening to us all –
But not to you, still cozy in your bubble
Telling other people what to do.
 
When the dust has settled and the dead are buried,
All the gas-queue martyrs laid to rest,
You’ll spin your noble part in it on Facebook
Though you were fucking Jonah, pal, at best.




08 March 2022

Farewell, Atahualpa


Errol Knower, 1960-2022

Visiting the mortician’s parlour to pay his last respects to the remains of Errol Knower, another former member of the crack athletics squad that St Thomas’s College fielded in the mid-Seventies reminisced to his fellow mourners how, on track days, Errol – always a dedicated truant – would sit with his louche, unathletic cronies at a tea-kiosk up on the Galle Road, smoking and telling funny stories, listening all the while with half a ear to the voice of the meet marshal calling events and results over the PA system on the school grounds below. When they called an event he was in, he would drink up his tea, stub out his ‘fag’ and race down the hill, arriving at the starting-line just in time for the gun. He would then run the race itself without any apparent effort, seeming to float along the track. ‘He didn’t seem to be moving any faster than the others. You knew he was faster when you saw him breast the tape.’ Two Sri Lanka Public Schools track records set by Errol would stand for almost thirty years.

Those records were fated, however, to be the sum total of what might be described, by conventional reckoning, as Errol’s life achievements. Well, perhaps not quite – he once played Atahualpa in a cut-down version of Peter Shaffer’s The Royal Hunt of the Sun, which won his house at St Thomas’s first prize at the annual Old Boys’ Day drama competition. This will mean little except to Old Thomians, who know what a big deal the inter-house drama competition is. Errol had only one line in the script, but he looked authentically, regally Inca with that magnificent hooked nose and upright carriage of his, dressed in a stunning costume made up for him by Caryll Ponniah, who loved him only slightly less than she loved her own sons. 

By conventional reckoning, Errol Christopher Lawrence Knower did nothing with his life. He had no ‘career’; most of the time he didn’t even have a job. In spite of his natural gifts he had no real interest in sports, either; he abandoned athletics the day he left school. He never married, never raised a family, never felt the joy of looking into a grandchild’s eyes. For most of his adult life, he had no steady partner. He had no skills apart from a rudimentary ability to cook. He loved music to distraction, but an early attempt to learn the guitar was quickly abandoned. Practising was far too much like work, and Errol was lazy. It probably did not help that his best friend at school and his own elder brother were each masters of the instrument.

He left St Thomas’s without, I believe, taking his O-levels – certainly without passing them. Someone from the Thomian old-boy network gave him a job selling fridges and gas cookers. He loathed it and played truant constantly, just as he had at school. His employer put up with it for a few months for the sake of the old College tie, then sacked him. Next, he did a bit of DJing; it was probably the thing he stuck to longest. He worked at a tourist resort on the south coast for some time, but I never went to hear him.

Multiple tragedies struck him in a cluster during his youth. His mother died. His elder brother and sister emigrated, each to a different country, while he stayed behind, living in a crumbling old Dutch house with his elderly father. His enviably gorgeous girlfriend dumped him, then emigrated too. 

While most of this was happening, I was in England, failing to obtain a physics degree. When I came back in 1981 and began looking up my old friends, Errol had vanished from the scene. It didn’t take long to find out why. Cheap Chinese heroin had hit Colombo while I was abroad, and many of its first victims were members of that tiny, confused band of nonconformists, mostly English-educated middle-class kids, who had taken up the long-haired, peace-sign-flashing hippie lifestyle they’d seen in movies and Life magazine photos. I had been one of those kids myself, listening to and passing round hard-to-obtain rock and soul LPs from abroad, smoking ganja and saying maaan a lot. Errol was one, too. These kids weren’t nearly as sophisticated as they thought they were: when smack came along (greyish brown in colour, smoked off a scrap of tinfoil rather than injected), many had no idea what a danger it posed. They got stuck on it like flies on flybait.

One of the flies, I learnt, had been Errol.

*     *     *

Meanwhile, I was working in the advertising business, finding my own adult circle, dating girls who didn’t really care for me, playing in amateur rock bands and generally building a life, all against the background of the bloody, atrocious civil war into which Lanka’s post-colonial favourite sport of oppressing ethnic and linguistic minorities had finally, inevitably, plunged us. All this time, I never saw Errol. Every now and then, I would hear something about him. The news was rarely good.

Then, in 1988, my own life hit a bit of a speed bump and I found myself regularly visiting a friend called Imtiaz Hamid, a very chilled and gentle man, one of the oldest of Lanka’s hippie generation. At his house a handful of troubled souls would gather to smoke weed, listen to music and talk. We were a kind of mutual therapy group with Imti as the moderator. All of us had suffered reverses in life. Some had had troubles with drugs, some had been dumped by partners or were struggling with their emotional lives, at least one had serious mental-health issues. Amongst these wounded creatures, I was reunited with Errol.

He had got himself off smack some years earlier, going through the terror and misery of cold turkey all alone without help or comfort from anyone. I would add this to the tally of Errol’s life achievements without hesitation; most of the other once-respectable Colombo lads who took up heroin at the same time he did are now either hopeless alcoholics, still on it, or dead. For all that, the years lost to addiction had damaged him badly. He could never really hope to be a normal person after that. 

But he could, and did, return to the world. Imtiaz’s circle extended well beyond his ‘patients’; other interesting people – artists and ad people, filmmakers and former movie stars, rogue academics, old-money eccentrics, the Hindu priest of the Kataragama Maha Devale – would drop in from time to time. Many of these visitors saw something in Errol that they liked. They took him up, invited him to parties, introduced him to their friends. Pretty soon, Errol was moving in the most fashionable circles. Society adored him.

It was not at all clear why. Errol was tall and had a well-muscled, lanky runner’s physique, but you wouldn’t exactly call him handsome. He had decent manners and the social advantages of his Thomian education, but he wasn’t what you would call sophisticated or even, really, a very interesting conversationalist. He was not yet the energetic and hilarious raconteur he would become in later years; this was the period during which he was living the stories he would later tell. He had no claim to fame, no glittering career or trophy to serve as his calling-card, only those long-ago athletic records – which in any case he never mentioned (not in my hearing, anyway, and I was often with him in those days). When he compiled music CDs or DJ’d at parties, people were just as likely to complain as to dig it. As for money, the ultimate passport, Errol was always as poor as a church-mouse. He had his faults, too: his morals were as eccentric as the rest of him and he was fiercely intolerant of those he considered bad hats, occasionally giving vent to embarrassing public tirades against them. He was a terrible, terrible snob. He was dreadful to waiters, taxi-drivers and servitors in general, though he made an exception for his friends’ domestic help. He was unreliable; you learnt never to put any store in his promises, well meant though they were. He was absurdly, disastrously, hilariously unpunctual; if you ever arranged to pick Errol up on your way to a concert or a party, you would surely be late for it and stood a good chance of never getting there at all. He was clumsy. He bumped into things and smashed them. He had a tendency to grumble loud and long when he was peeved. 

All was tolerated, even embraced, for Errol had the gift of making people love him. He made us comfortable. He made us relax. He played us music. He made us happy.

From time to time his friends would give him jobs, mostly in advertising and other service ‘industries’. He would last a month or two, sowing chaos through the office and insulting valued clients, till came the inevitable parting of the ways. After a while it became patent to all who knew him that Errol neither could nor would work. He had problems with relationships, too; after his first girlfriend left him and went to Australia, he would be without a long-term partner for well over twenty years. 

*     *     *

By the time I got married for the first time, Errol had moved up in life. He was now living in jet-set mode, entirely subsidized by his friends. They made a darling of him, showering him with presents, pressing drink and drugs and occasional sexual bonbons upon him. Though still unemployed, still living with his father and largely bereft of income, he lived a rock star’s life – the life, it was not hard to see, that he had always dreamed of. He developed a taste for booze and cocaine. It became normal for him to stay up for several nights in a row, partying with his new set.

Pretty soon, he lost his bearings completely. He ceased to have any interest in self-maintenance. His home became a filthy, cobweb-festooned mess. He began misbehaving in other ways too, which need not concern us here. Being dependent on his rich pals to support his new lifestyle, he was forced to make some urgent adjustments to his moral compass, and the mental acrobatics he performed to justify himself at the time were easily the ugliest thing I ever saw in Errol’s life.

Still, he and I continued to get together (usually when he was coming down after some three-day party), listen to and share music, go to concerts and jam sessions and make weekend jaunts out of the city. For a while he ‘worked’ in the same office as my first wife: she dubbed him the Voice of Colombo because his desk telephone served as an interchange for all the gossip of the city’s bohemian elite. I dubbed him Petronius, because it seemed to me that no-one in that set could do anything – go anywhere, take up a new fashion, serve a new cocktail, start an affair, even go to the bathroom – without Errol’s say-so, any more than the smart set round the Emperor Nero could make a move without the approval of the Arbiter.

I was beginning to wonder whether my friend would meet his end in some Pulp Fiction-type disaster: maybe in a bathtub full of blood and warm water, surrounded by laughing beauties, just like Petronius. He had some terrifying adventures with a few of the women who hang about the white-powder scene – damaged harpies who spread devastation all around them. Eventually he found a real woman, and that was what saved him. 

Jacqui had a job as an ad executive; no doubt her salary kept them both afloat. Perhaps Errol, too, had money to contribute from time to time. The two of them became a couple, moved in together. After his father died, they left the cavernous, crumbling old Knower home for a more affordable place and Errol finally settled into long-overdue domesticity.

The following decade or so may well have been the best years of his life. Jacqui became the relatively still centre he needed (a perfectly still centre would not have worked at all) and though the partying continued, it was with a far less toxic set. He gave up alcohol. He burnished his already growing reputation as a raconteur, reducing his listeners to helpless laughter with stories about the absurd events and people that had comprised his life – the latter including, of course, all of us. Errol was always a master of making people laugh at themselves.

Those halcyon days were never going to last. Errol was not made for domesticity. In the end, coping with his erratic and unpredictable ways while being the sole breadwinner in the household became, I surmise, a bit too much for Jacqui. She left, and started a new life with a man who had once been Errol’s schoolmate (and mine). Generously, the pair continued to look after Errol, paying his rent and helping him survive, often inviting him up to their place in the hills for weekends or whenever they needed someone to take care of their dogs while they were away. Errol loved all dogs just the way he loved people, or maybe even more; I don’t think he really distinguished between one species and the other.

*     *     *

By 2012 or so, despite his ex’s and her partner’s support, Errol was in obvious decline. He was living alone in a low-rent part of Colombo that most of us try to avoid visiting, in a house that looked as though the builders had abandoned it half finished. It was damp and messy and there were rats in the kitchen. Unsavoury-looking characters came and went. His appearance grew distinctly ragged, and the smoker’s cough he’d had for years (he always mixed his weed with tobacco) took on a graveyard echo. He took to keeping his fancy designer clothes – long-ago presents from his jet-set friends – at other people’s houses so that they didn’t get spoiled by the damp and insects at home.

I continued to visit him from time to time, though it was becoming a real trial. I’m fussy and hate messes of all kinds – and Errol, too, was growing ever more eccentric and excitable. Getting to his place from where I lived involved driving through the most traffic-choked and disreputable parts of the city of Colombo. Excuses, excuses… Still, I would visit every month or so, mostly on Sundays, and we would have a smoke together and listen to music and talk about old times. Sometimes he would give me a haircut; it was a skill ‘Aunty Caryll’ had taught him as a teenager, and he’d worked for some time at the most fashionable hairdresser’s in town – another of his short-lived periods of employment. Most of the time we sat and listened to music and reminisced. We were old men now, reflecting on our mad youth.

Around 2016, I stopped visiting regularly. By the time Covid struck I had barely seen Errol for about two years, though we kept in touch, talked on the phone, occasionally met at musical occasions of one kind or another. He could still get in anywhere he wanted to without having to pay for himself, a matter of great pride with him. Right to the end, he was always the same: cheerful, funny, angrily excitable about politics and communalism, unfailingly generous (poverty never stopped him) and always full of music.

Even after I drifted away, there remained, I am glad to say, a handful of people who kept in touch, looked out for and, of course, partied with my friend. They were all dedicated bohemians like him. On the last Saturday in February one of them called me, sobbing so hard I could barely understand what he was saying. At last I made out that Errol was dead. It had had happened the previous night. He’d been up at Jacqui and her partner’s place, alone, dog-sitting while they were away. He’d been receiving treatment for a ‘lung infection’, but he wasn’t actually sick; far from bedridden at any rate, and living what passed for a normal life by his standards. But Jacqui was worried about the cough, so she called in to check on him. He didn’t answer. After trying a few more times she asked a neighbour to go round to their house and take a look. The neighbour found Errol dead.

On the night before his funeral, I visited the parlour. His friends – the loyal few who had loved him – were trying to make a jolly old wake of it but it wasn’t working. Loud rock and funk music in the small, close room, cranked up high against the noise of the traffic outside, made it impossible to talk and everyone was far too sad and tired to pretend to party. The core group of mourners had been there since morning and looked absolutely shattered. I was worried about Covid, too, and left as soon as I decently could.

The funeral was better. Duleep de Chickera, the emeritus Bishop of Colombo who had been our chaplain at St Thomas’s in the Seventies, was speaking over the coffin when I arrived. He’d always been fond of Errol and had been touched to hear that the straying sheep had made a return to the fold, reading the Bible and attending Sunday service, in his last years. As the coffin was lowered, Jerome Speldewinde began a selection of songs, among them Knocking on Heaven’s Door, You’ll Never Walk Alone and Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah. My wife, who hasn’t really gone out since Covid struck Lanka, was shocked to see how old we’ve all become.

There was another wake, later, in the garden of an expensive nearby restaurant. It worked, unlike the one at the parlour – big crowd, lots of drink and refreshments, music and dancing, people in party clothes and much affectionate talk about the departed. A beautiful woman told me, laughing, that dying had been Errol’s final, desperate strategy to pull his long-scattered friends together and give them one last blast. An improper thought if ever there was one, but loving withal. Though slightly shocked, I endorsed it.

*     *     *

Errol Knower was one of a handful of people who, at different times in my life, have had a profound and lasting effect on me. I would be a different person today if not for him. I can’t explain how he changed me as a person, because I don’t really know; and to explain why we were lifelong friends at all would take a book. Once, long ago, another old acquaintance told me how sorry he felt for Errol and the sad mess he had made of his life. I looked at him in astonishment. Errol, I replied, is one of my great heroes. I don’t envy him or want to live his life, but I have nothing but admiration for his determination to do exactly what he wants and nothing more, for sticking to his erratic but well-defined morals and principles all through life, and for somehow surviving and even, at times, thriving with nothing more to sustain him than a positive outlook and the generosity of his friends. 

Errol became a well-known figure in Colombo society just by existing. He was welcomed and loved by many and, as far as I know, hated by none apart from one or two jealous wives who disapproved of him leading their husbands into trouble. Ladies, I know what you thought. But I was there, and I can assure you that it was always your husbands who led Errol into trouble, never the other way round.

Am I mourning him? I am not sure. The only time a death ever made me cry, my tears were for a hopeless, stupid waste of life rather than for the deceased themselves. It might seem to you, from what I’ve written here, that Errol, too, led a feckless, wasted life. I assure you that he did not. He was dealt a rotten hand and made more of it than most ever do with far better cards. If he was unhappy, it was buried so deep he did not even know it himself. He helped many, harmed no-one and experienced more pleasure (and, I suppose, more complementary pain) than most people will ever know in their lives. 

All in all, he was a remarkably lucky fellow. Despite the crazy life he led and the awful things that from time to time befell him, he never lost his good humour or his hopeful outlook. He did no-one any harm and a great many people, myself included, an incalculable amount of good. He managed successfully to live his whole life without growing up. And by dying at sixty-two, he has neatly avoided the terrible fate that I and many others feared was in store for him: a lonely, destitute and miserable old age.

All I have to mourn, really, is the fact that he isn’t around any more. A selfish minor detail, though of course it means the world to me. Farewell, Atahualpa.

©2022 by Richard Simon. 

Please cite author when sharing


05 December 2021

How to Feed A Tourist


Do you, like me, immediately think of hospitals, nurseries and geriatric wards whenever you are presented with one of these disgusting platters of pre-peeled fruit at the end of your meal at almost any Sri Lankan ‘tourist hotel’?

06 November 2021

Baby’s Woke Again

 


I shared this video of dogs coming down some kind of playground chute or slide on Facebook. The dogs all look very happy at the bottom and some even try to climb back up for a second ride. Still, a few people looked at the video and wondered if the dogs had been frightened and not wanted to go. Had they been forced down the chute – pushed into it – against their will? It didn't matter to these people that the dogs had had a great experience and were happy at the bottom. They were focused on the fear the animals might have felt at the top. They were concerned that cruelty and trauma might have been involved. I suppose you might say they were woke.

These people made me wonder whether I should feel bad for having shared the video. But I couldn’t. The dogs were unharmed and obviously happy. It seemed to me that they were better off after going down the chute than they had been before. 

Then it came to me that those dogs being put through a chute were a metaphor for things like education, hard work and the duties we all owe to community and society.

Not many people enjoy being educated, or working hard, or having to obey laws and rules and conventions. Social duties like voting are a real chore, as is everything else we need to do to play our part in a complex modern society – paying taxes, going on jury duty, wearing a mask during a pandemic, obeying road rules, etc. These things are difficult, tedious, sometimes painful, always more or less unpleasant. Not as bad as going to the dentist, true, but no fun.

Yet when we've done them, the benefits are clear to us. We’re personally empowered, have added to our own resources and feel good about ourselves. Often we find that we've enjoyed the ride despite ourselves, just like the dogs in the video. And everyone around us (i.e. society) has benefited too

But since these things don't seem like fun (and even daunting or scary at first), we often have to be coerced into them – ‘trained’, if you like, or ‘traumatized’ and ‘brainwashed’ if you prefer. Much of this is done to us as children, but it continues into adulthood – difficult and unpleasant things that we do or endure in order to improve our own lives, and the lives of others, in the long run.

Wise folk have no problem with this. Others resent it and often push back. The rebels used to be ignored or suffer general rebuke for as long as people accepted that some irritations and inconveniences are necessary in life. But they don’t any more. They think they don’t need to. And so the rebellion spreads.

That is only possible because the world, compared to how it was (say) fifty years ago, is richer, healthier, better developed and – in the places where most of us live, at least – cleaner. Life, most of the time, is not that hard. And for all the worry about growing authoritarianism, people today have many more choices than they did back then, which makes them, by definition, more free. 

All this is great – progress! But something else was happening too, silently and without many people noticing, while we were beating back poverty around the world, destroying Communism on the left and old elites on the right, and establishing our interconnected, mediated consumer society. We slipped our tether to reality, and we didn’t even realize that we were now adrift.

Life today, even for modest working folk in most parts of the world, has a lot in common with the old dream of living in Aladdin's cave. Everything is available at the touch of a screen (to be lusted after and yearned for even if we can’t afford it); household chores and most jobs are easy and safe, wars and revolutions are rare (except when, and where, they aren't) and everything is about aspiration: getting better, doing great, cutting away all the stuff that keeps you from ‘ascending’ – materially, socially, spiritually. But along the way, we became distanced from and largely forgot about the real, dirty, complex, difficult processes that deliver to us the necessities and luxuries of life – the factories, farms, roads and bridges and other infrastructure, the legal systems, bureaucracies and governments needed to manage and regulate it, the social conventions that keep us from one another’s throats. We have even learnt to look away from the huge amounts of hard labour and misery that are still needed to make our everyone-an-island consumer society work. We can do this because everything now comes and goes through a media-devised interface – a simulation of the world that is partly designed to help you escape from ugly reality into a paradise of artificial entertainment, but mainly designed to encourage you to consume – by making you anxious and envious and discontented, because that’s the way you get people to want things. Trust me on this: I was an advertising and public relations man for 35 years, and I've sold everything from antacids to education reform. I know how people are made to want things: by appealing to their lowest instincts.

Lost in this consumerist simulation of reality, we – the bourgeoisie, the striving classes (once known as the working class but now including clerical, sales – ‘and marketing’ – and mid-level executive workers), even some of the upper classes – have come to ignore or take for granted the contract that we are all party to – the mutual agreement that props up the real world. Forgetting our commitments, we have come to think that all the things we enjoy so easily nowadays – every one of which is a privilege – are ours by right. We have forgotten that life is difficult and dangerous, that it demands labour and sacrifice and growing a thicker skin. We have become infantilized: spoilt brats who don't see why they have to go through the chute. We don't just want it all and want it now; we want it our way, too, without any sacrifice on our own part.

Few any longer enjoy the happiness and peace of mind that comes from having gone through the chute, of being a fully equipped, adequately educated and emotionally mature adult. Few people derive any satisfaction from doing the right thing in life, or in doing their part to help make the world go round. And society, bereft of their participation, becomes a little less functional, a bit less effective. Slowly, it begins to crumble. 

In some places, like the unhappy, brutalized, communalist state that has displaced my native country of Ceylon, society is at the point of collapse. In the West and the technocratic East, despite all the weeping and wailing, it’s still pretty strong; but it won’t be if this goes on for much longer. Consumer capitalism has become a victim of its own success. It has become disconnected from reality, and it has no place left to go but down.


16 June 2021

Move Along, There


Restless Creatures
by Matt Wilkinson

Matt Wilkinson proposes that locomotion – getting from place to place – is the primary driver of evolution in all living things including, perhaps surprisingly, plants. It makes sense if you think about it. Getting from one place to another isn’t absolutely essential for survival or reproduction, but it does offer compelling selective advantages.

The book is divided into ten chapters. Nine of them trace the evolution of movement backward through time, beginning with human locomotion (walking and running) and ending with the transport mechanisms of prokaryotes – the famous bacterial flagella and the more primitive method of mucus excretion, or pooping yourself along. The final chapter deals with the impact of locomotion on cognition, and why humans need to return to a more legwork-powered lifestyle.

All this is enormously interesting but I am not sure that Wilkinson explains it as effectively as he might. It’s a difficult task he’s taken on and he discharges it quite well, but I often found myself having to re-read passages with close attention and trace obsessively the accompanying diagrams before I understood what was going on. I have an education in the (physical) sciences; I’m not sure how readers without that advantage will fare.

In Wilkinson’s defence, some of the phenomena he describes are very complex and still quite poorly understood. It is only this century, for example, that we have really come to understand how the movements fish make with their tails and bodies propel them through the water. The construction, operation and evolution of bacterial cilia is also, he makes us understand, an ongoing field of biological research.

I enjoyed reading the book and found it very instructive, but I could not avoid the feeling that Richard Dawkins or Matt Ridley would have made a better fist of the subject.

14 September 2020

Stinking Poor

Orwell writes brilliant prose even when he is trying to nauseate you.

This he succeeds in doing very effectively here through his description of life as a plongeur or dishwasher at a couple of Paris restaurants. Even though times have changed (and I don’t live in Paris anyway), I shall certainly remember this book next time I eat out. You will too, if you read it, and we shall both consume nothing but bottled mineral water that day as a result.


If the dishwashing chapters don’t make you spew, the chapters on bedding down in the ‘casual wards’ (dosshouses) of London and Kent surely will.


So, dear reader, consider yourself warned. If, in spite of my words, you still go ahead and read this book, good for you. You should; I should have read it ages ago myself. Besides, you will love it, even if at times you find it hard to go on.


Stay the course! Don’t let yourself be put off by the utopian-socialist analyses of the lives and sufferings of tramps and plongeurs. Despite the lucidity and honesty of his writing, Orwell was a man who thought with his heart not his brain. The politics he espoused – his sturdy opposition to totalitarianism excepted – was nonsense. His one great insight was that Communist Russia was an evil, oppressive tyranny, not the workers’ Paradise his fellow Socialists in Britain thought it was. That isn’t relevant here, of course. But the batty socioeconomics interleaved among the pages of perceptive and courageous prose fiction or journalism is the price one pays for loving Orwell.

01 January 2020

Jumping the God Shark

Fields of Blood
Religion & the History of Violence

by Karen Armstrong

A REVIEW OF THE INTRODUCTION TO THIS BOOK

Theology is, of course, mostly concerned with the distortion and obfuscation of truth. The simple ‘truths’ of religion cannot bear dispassionate scrutiny, so they have to be cloaked in layers of sophisticated misdirection to protect them from the light. Such is the purpose of theology.

But I read and write history, and it is hard to do this without encountering some theology along the way. When I was younger, I found these excursions enjoyable. Over time, though, my critical faculties grew keener and I became less willing to waste good reading and thinking time on nonsense.

Such is the perspective from which I read the introduction to Karen Armstrong’s book about religion and violence, Fields of Blood. I had meant to read the whole book, but found this impossible.

Armstrong, commendably, wastes no time introducing her thesis: it is presented in the very first paragraph of the introduction, in the shape of another writer’s observation that religion has been made a scapegoat for the human predisposition to violence.

Ah, so. A history book with a theological proposition – which is to say, an attempt to hide the hairy, smelly truths of human motive and action under petticoats of elaborate fabrication. Having stated her thesis, Armstrong next constructs a straw-man definition of religion ‘as seen in the West’ that no person of faith could possibly accept for an instant. This definition deserves to be quoted in full.

A coherent system of obligatory beliefs, institutions and rituals, centring on a supernatural God, whose practice is essentially private and sealed off from all ‘secular’ activities.

What rubbish. That's a description of the trees, not the wood, and a pretty bad one at that. But Armstrong tells us this is what ‘we in the West’ (I’m not from the West) think religion is, and then proceeds to tell us why we’re wrong.

Other cultures, she tells us, have different, more expansive definitions. As an example she gives us Debuisson’s description of the Sanskrit term dharma,: ‘a “total” concept, untranslatable, that covers law, justice, morals and social life.’

Oh what precious twaddle. Dharma is very easily translated as ‘applied moral philosophy’. But yes, of course, religion is Protean. It’s like money – one of those consensual illusions on which human society and culture are founded, but which elude definition. So? All this palaver with definitions is clearly a setup for sleights of hand to come, allowing the author to include and exclude facts and points of view as suits her case without alerting the reader. It was at this point that I realized there was no value in continuing with this book.

I thought I would at least finish the introduction, but three pages on I came to a digression on the chemistry of the brain in which Ms Armstrong makes a complete fool of herself, getting serotonin all wrong. I could see no reason to read further.

For what it’s worth, I agree with the thesis that religion is not to blame for the violence perpetrated in its name. No more is money the root of all evil. These things are conduits for the potential to do evil that exists, pent up, in all of us, but if we didn’t have them, we would simply find other ways to express it. It is ourselves, not our institutions, that are to blame.

But Armstrong’s approach to the proposition is simply untenable. It is not the study of history but the study of evolutionary psychology that will, perhaps, one day exonerate religion – as the common man understands it – from blame for all the atrocities perpetrated in its name.

I have enjoyed and been enlightened by Karen Armstrong’s work in the past, when she was in a more sceptical mode and had interesting things to say about, for instance, fundamentalism. That era is now long gone. She has become a book factory, reliably churning out another god-bothering tome every year, to the undoubted delight of her fans, her publishers and her bank manager, but with nothing of substance left to say. A sad if somewhat unusual case of the commercialization of religion.